Ever wonder if you should use Workling or Delayed::Job? RestfulAuth or AuthLogic? Paperclip or Attachment Fu? It can be confusing to try and figure out what tool to use for the job. You have many choices for your project, but it is important to look at key elements to influence your decisions.
Looking at a commit log may seem like the obvious way to gauge this, and it is! A lot of people tend to overlook this simple fact. Is the project like Delayed Job where you only see a commit every 2 months and it is a documentation patch? Look yourself, compare Starling to AMQP - AMQP has updates less than a month old, Starling appears abandoned since April.
This metric is probably one of the single most important ones you can look at, and it doesn’t take that long!
Another quick metric that can help you gauge how active a project is. The bigger the network, the more community activity there is around a project. I think the benefits of an active community are pretty obvious
One gotcha to watch out for here is a “canonical master” repo that isn’t updating or taking any pull requests… Then you end up with 100 different forks of a project and no one driving the project, again like DelayedJob.
Don’t overlook another simple metric for plugins and gems: read the code! Open up Textmate and browse the code. Browse through the tests and maybe even give them a try. If you are going to have your project rely on this functionality, isn’t it worth investing 20 minutes to really look through things?
If you aren’t 100% sure what you are looking at in the code, you have other options as well. Fire up metric_fu and run it on the project. Still daunted? Use caliper, they handle it all for you! They can take any public github repo and generate metric fu scores off of it.
The last metric to look for when examining a gem or plugin are your help options. Here are some key questions to find answers for:
Well, my friends, let me share a bit of growth pain I experienced in a project. When I first started tweet hopper, I decided to use Starling for queue handling. Why not, twitter used it… Everything ran great as long as I had one box with the job running daemons and the job queue. Everything fell apart slowly as I moved to two boxes, even load balancing between two starling servers didn’t help.
That is when I decided that RabbitMQ might be my best bet, I had heard great things about Erlang’s capabilities in the scaling department. After much deliberation and studying, I decided to make the leap and use AMQP and Eventmachine to interact with RabbitMQ. The choice of AMQP was a no brainer, we already used daemon-kit and it has native AMQP support. The switch took less than a weekend to get up and running!
In the end, we went from two starling queue servers and two daemon servers running 8 daemon workers each, to two queue server and two daemon servers running one daemon each. Starling was constant source of pain, the servers would just start handing out random timeouts after they were up for 24 hours or more. With RabbitMQ, I check in once a day out of habit, but I have yet to restart it in the past 6 months.
Use the best tool for the job, don’t be afraid to look outside your main language or to push outside your comfort levels. Don’t hesitate to make a switch to another plugin or gem if the one you are using doesn’t seem to fit your needs. Most of all, just take some time to really examine what you are using - it can go a long way.